COIN GRADING
The grading of coins
is one of those areas of numismatics that is inevitably somewhat subjective,
and people are often
inclined to over grade their coins, particularly when trying to sell them. This
is certainly true of
coins seen for sale on the internet, where they are often claimed to be of a
much higher grade than
they actually turn out to be. Terms such as “Rare”, “Proof”,
“Uncirculated”, and “Mint
Condition” are regularly misused, mostly through ignorance of the
correct meanings of
the definitions, but sometimes to mislead less aware buyers. Other terms
sometimes used to
describe condition, such as “Superb”, “Excellent”, “Magnificent”, “Collectable”
and other similar
adjectives are actually quite meaningless and the buyer is advised to purchase
with extreme caution
if such a coin description is not accompanied by a recognised grading.
Consequently, the
correct grading of a coin remains the most important factor, alongside rarity,
affecting its value.
This note therefore defines and explains the most frequent terms relating to
coin condition used by
British numismatists. It is Brushwood policy to use coins graded at
uncirculated or higher
in our products wherever possible, and the standard grading system
defined below in
descending order of merit is the one we have adopted.
FDC: (Fleur de Coin) a coin in perfect mint state, with no
wear, abrasions or marks, and
full lustre. The
abbreviation FDC is often used. (This definition is
mostly reserved for
coins minted to proof quality, as coins intended
for normal circulation
will have been in contact with others during
both the production
and distribution processes resulting in minor bag
marks and blemishes.)
Proof: this is not a condition as such, but implies that the coin has
been
struck using specially
prepared dies with individually polished
blanks, and also that
the minting process has been carried out
usually twice under
higher pressure to ensure the die is completely
filled. Normally the
background fields of a proof coin are highly
polished, with the
raised design matt. However proofs where the
whole coin is matt
exist, and sometimes the design itself is polished.
A characteristic of
all proof coins is that they have very sharp edges
because of the high
pressures used to ensure that the metal flows
fully into all details
of the design. The Royal Mint has produced
Proof sets regularly
for sale every year since 1970, when it issued a
set representing the
last £SD coins prior to decimalisation. (The
1970 coins however
were not issued into circulation as legal tender,
and so only exist as
proofs. There are also a few other years since
decimalisation when
certain coins were only ever issued in the proof
sets of that year.)
Brilliant Uncirculated: this
implies that the coin still retains its original full mint lustre, with
no toning or tarnish.
Often BU or BUNC is used as the abbreviation.
BUNC coins are
generally expected to be in FDC condition & since
1982 the Royal Mint
has produced individually packaged coin year
sets for sale in
perfect BUNC condition, in addition to the limited
edition proof sets
produced each year.
Uncirculated (UNC): a coin with no wear at
all, although it is possible for the design not to
have been perfectly
struck in the minting process. There may also
be small bag
abrasions. Coins in this condition are in ‘mint’ condition
although older coins may
be tarnished or toned. Sometimes the
abbreviation “aUNC”
(about uncirculated) is used to indicate a coin
that is very close to
UNC but not quite in perfect condition.
Extremely Fine (EF): slight
wear will be noticeable on high spots on close inspection, but
all other detail is
clear and sharp. Much mint lustre may remain,
usually around the
edges of the raised design and lettering. Coins in
EF condition, for
example, will retain almost all detail of the
monarch’s hair styling
on the obverse side, and it is this aspect that
often gives away coins
that are not truly in EF condition, even if the
reverse appears to be.
Very Fine (VF): most detail on the coin will
be clear, but obvious evidence of wear
due to limited
circulation will be present. High spots will be worn, but
much underlying detail
will remain. Traces of mint lustre may linger
amongst the letters of
the inscription. (Coins of lesser condition than
VF are often only
worth collecting to fill gaps in collections, unless
they are rare.)
Fine (F): the coin will be worn over whole area, but only the highest spots
are
worn completely
through and show no underlying detail. For
example, coins showing
no detail of the monarch’s hair should not
be graded above fine.
Very Good (VG): considerable wear will be
seen over the whole coin, and high spots
will be worn through.
Coins in this or lower grades are really only
collectable if
extremely rare
Good (G): inscriptions and date will be considerably worn but still legible.
Fair: date and denomination will be legible, and coin type recognizable,
but very little other
detail visible
Poor: inscriptions worn off, date is illegible, with only the outline of
the
design visible. Such coins are generally
of no value to a collector.
NOTE GRADING
Uncirculated (UNC)
- refers to a banknote that is bright and has no handling damage, such as folds
or creases, nor any cuts, stains, or rounded corners
About uncirculated (AU)
- a banknote that is still bright but has trivial handling damage, i.e. a light
center fold (not a crease, which is a break of the fibres of the paper),
without rounded corners.
Extremely fine (XF or EF)
- a banknote with one crease or up to three light folds. Paper still bright and
attractive, very slight wear to corners allowed.
Very Fine (VF)
- Note still attractive, but possible slight dirt or smudging, may have several
horizontal and/or vertical folds. Paper remains relatively crisp. No tears, but
slight wear to edges and corners is allowable.
Fine (F) - Paper is now
slightly soft, considerable wear due to folds from use in circulation. Minor
tears to note, not extending into the design. Clear but not bright in
appearance. Staple holes but not holes due to folding.
Very Good (VG)
- Much wear. Paper is limp. Tears can extend into the design. Staining
possible. Discoloration possible. Hole at center caused by folding allowable.
Note still looks presentable.
Good (G) - Very much
wear, as VG, but more so. Graffiti on note. Small pieces of the note may be
missing
Fair - Larger pieces
of note torn off/missing, compared with G. Less of the note intact.
Poor - Severe damage
due to wear, staining, missing pieces, graffiti and/or holes. May be taped
together, have pieces missing. The worst possible condition.
The grade or condition of a banknote is a matter of
opinion more than an exact science. There are guidelines that are presently
used, which have been found to be satisfactory, however as is often the case,
there is more than one standard guideline.
One system works on points in grading, starting with
100 for an uncirculated banknote, then deducts
5 points for a crease to a tear etc. The problem is that the position of a dirt
stain can make a lot of difference to the value of a banknote. If it is one the
obverse side of the banknote for example in the middle of the banknote, this
will affect the value dramatically, rather than if in the corner of the
banknote.
The most popular system of banknote grading in
Australia is one adopted by the British Museum. This grading system starts with
Poor which simply means the banknote is
severely damaged. The next grade is good,
this in actual fact a contradiction of terms, as it actually means the banknote
is "bad". Such banknotes are badly damaged; however they qualify as
"good" because the printed design
is complete. Then comes Very Good, again a
misconception, it simply means the banknote is not quite as bad as good.
These first three grades should be avoided by the
investor, unless extremely rare banknotes.
A good guide for the investor is to avoid all
banknotes under the grade of Fine, which is
the next grade. Grades of Fine and above
have many things in common, they are appealing, with no severe damage to spoil
the look of the banknote.
A banknote that qualifies as Fine will show substantial evidence of circulation, creases,
folds and stains-the combined effect of these faults should not detract from
the overall appearance of the banknote.
A banknotes that qualifies as Very Fine would be satisfactory to the majority of
investors. In this grade the banknote will show obvious signs of circulation,
multiple folds etc, is otherwise undamaged and appealing.
A banknote that qualifies as Extra Fine should be, there are some signs of circulation, with
up to possibly 6 folds or a heavy centrefold, crease marks etc. It should have
a near uncirculated look, have crispness to
the touch, and otherwise be undamaged.
A banknote that qualifies as Uncirculated, means simply a perfect banknote in every way,
there will be no blemishes, folds, flicks or any use of any kind, "let
your eyes be your guide", in any fault whatsoever is seen ,the banknote is
not Uncirculated.
Australian catalogues offer detailed definitions of
the grading terms they use, and their interpretations. The investor is always
advised to study both the catalogue and dealer's sales catalogues carefully.
It will become obvious that personal judgements
are never the same, with a number of dealers (however many, may be in the
minority) will buy a Very Fine banknote, and
upgrade the banknote to an Extra Fine when
selling the same banknote. This confusion arises where half grades to describe
a banknote, examples being a Very Fine can
either be a Good Very Fine+ or near Very Fine. There is nothing wrong with this
grading system, if the investor is aware to treat the purchase as a Very Fine, Extra Fine
for the purpose of purchase. If the investor decides the banknote is a Very Fine+, with the dealer asking a little more
for the banknote, it is a good bargaining point.
No comments:
Post a Comment